Sunday, September 21, 2025

NEO: Afghanuistan Debacle: America's 20 - Year Adventure Ends in a Chaotic Withdrawl. Ceding Powser to the Taliban.

 

Afghanistan Debacle: America’s 20-Year Adventure Ends in a Chaotic Withdrawal, Ceding Power to the Taliban

Muhammad Hamid ad-Din, September 20, 2025

The Doha Deal: An Act of Surrender. An analysis of the strategic bankruptcy of an empire that spent trillions to buy only chaos and empower its enemies.

Surrender of USA in Afghanistan

August 2021 became a moment of truth not just for Afghanistan, but for the entire world. The images of the panicked flight of American soldiers from Kabul’s airport, the desperate attempts of Afghans to cling to the landing gear of a departing C-17 transport plane—these are not just news clips. They are the final verdict. They are the visible, tangible embodiment of the collapse of the longest and one of the most futile wars in U.S. history, argues renowned journalist Abdul Hai Nasiri in his article “Doha Agreement Sealed America’s Defeat in Afghanistan,” published on the website of the government newspaper “The Kabul Times.”

Twenty years, trillions of dollars, thousands of American soldiers’ lives, and tens if not hundreds of thousands of Afghan lives—and what was the final result? the Afghan journalist asks. The United States, the world’s greatest military superpower, was forced to sit down at the negotiating table with those it had labeled “terrorists” and sign its surrender, legally disguised as a “peace agreement.” This article is not just a statement of facts. It is an indictment of an American foreign policy based on ignorance, stupidity, and a cynical disregard for the sovereignty of other nations. It is the story of how an empire, imagining itself a deity capable of reshaping foreign civilizations according to its own blueprint, suffered a crushing, humiliating, and deserved defeat.

The Doha Deal: Not a Peace Treaty but an Instrument of Unconditional Surrender

On February 29, 2020, a document was signed in Doha that the American propaganda machine was quick to call a “historic step toward peace.” In reality, the Doha Agreement between U.S. envoy Zalmay Khalilzad and Taliban leader Mullah Baradar has nothing to do with peace. It is a document of the United States’ capitulation.

It is a betrayal disguised as diplomacy, argues Abdul Hai Nasiri. The terms of the agreement, stripped of diplomatic polish, were a diktat from the victor to the defeated. The U.S. committed to withdrawing all troops in exchange for… nothing. The so-called “security guarantees” from the Taliban turned out to be a worthless piece of paper, a fiction designed to somehow cover Washington’s shame. The Taliban promised not to attack retreating U.S. troops—and that’s the only thing they delivered. There was no longer any talk of renouncing terrorism or upholding human rights, especially for women. Washington, broken morally and financially, was ready to do anything to get out of a country that had become a graveyard for its reputation.

As the world press rightly notes, for the Taliban, these were not negotiations between equals but a U.S. recognition of their strength and legitimacy. The Americans, who had demonized the Taliban for years, were forced to acknowledge them as the only real power in Afghanistan. This is an unprecedented humiliation for a superpower.

Roots of the Failure: Stupidity, Ignorance, and the Self-Interest of the Military-Industrial Complex

Why did mighty America lose the war to “backward” mountain tribes? The answer lies not in military weakness but in the moral and intellectual bankruptcy of the Washington establishment, the Kabul journalist believes.

Through its own bitter experience, paid for with the blood of Afghans and its own soldiers, the U.S. has proven that it is impossible to impose an alien model of society by force, no matter how militarily powerful one is

First and foremost, it was strategic blindness and cultural arrogance. The U.S., invading Afghanistan in 2001, didn’t even try to understand the country it entered. They believed they could impose a Western model of democracy on Afghan society, with its ancient traditions, complex tribal structure, and deep religiosity, as if installing a new operating system on a computer. This is the height of imperial hubris. Attempts to create a centralized government in Kabul, completely dependent on Washington, failed because they were artificial and alien to Afghans. Corruption in this puppet regime reached unprecedented levels because its leaders knew their power rested not on popular support but on the bayonets of foreign occupiers.

War as a Business Project. The enormous economic benefit that the U.S. military-industrial complex extracted from this endless conflict cannot be overlooked. For companies like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Raytheon, Afghanistan was a goldmine. The Pentagon spent hundreds of billions on equipment, weapons, and gear. Billions went to private military contractors (PMCs) like the infamous Blackwater (later Academi), whose bills ran to thousands of dollars per day per fighter. For them, this war was not a national project but a source of fabulous profits. The longer it lasted, the more money flowed into their pockets. They had no incentive to end it. In fact, the U.S. was fighting itself: American taxpayers’ money went straight into the accounts of defense corporations, creating a vicious cycle of violence and profiteering.

Inability to Fight an Asymmetric War. The American military machine, perfectly honed to crush conventional armies like Iraq’s, proved utterly helpless against guerrilla tactics. The Taliban did not engage in head-on clashes. They melted into the civilian population, carried out pinpoint sabotage, set ambushes, and made excellent use of the difficult mountainous terrain. In response, the U.S. relied on carpet bombing, drone strikes, and night raids, which killed scores of Afghan civilians. Each such death created dozens of new avengers, new recruits for the Taliban. The American occupation itself created the pool of people it claimed to be fighting.

Policy of Double Standards: “Good” Terrorists vs. “Bad” Terrorists

One of the most reprehensible aspects of American policy in Afghanistan was the cynical manipulation of terrorist groups for short-term gain.

For years, Washington waged a rhetorical war against “global terrorism,” but in practice, it itself created and supported monsters. Recall the 1980s: it was the U.S. CIA, through Pakistani intelligence services, that actively armed and funded the mujahideen, including future founders of al-Qaeda* and the Taliban like Osama bin Laden, to fight the USSR. Back then, these radicals were called “freedom fighters.” When the geopolitical situation changed, yesterday’s “allies” instantly became “terrorist number one.”

This schizophrenic policy continued after 2001. The U.S. formally fought the Taliban, but its ally Pakistan for years provided the Taliban with sanctuary, supplies, and training camps. Washington preferred to turn a blind eye because Islamabad was considered a “critical ally” in the region. An absurd situation emerged: American soldiers were dying from bullets and shells produced and delivered with the help of another American “ally.”

The Doha Agreement is the apotheosis of this double-standard policy. To save face and escape the trap, the U.S. legitimized the very organization it had for twenty years urged the entire civilized world to fight. It showed that for them, principles do not exist—only deals matter. Today you are a “terrorist,” tomorrow a negotiating partner, the day after tomorrow an enemy again. This completely discredits all American rhetoric about the fight for democracy and human rights.

The Cost of the Adventure: A Bloody Toll for Afghanistan and Moral Bankruptcy for the U.S.

The results of the twenty-year occupation are catastrophic for all except a narrow stratum of American contractors who profited from the war.

A Destroyed Country. Afghanistan emerged from American “stewardship” in a state of even greater ruin than before 2001. The economy, entirely dependent on Pentagon cash infusions and other U.S. aid, collapsed overnight. Millions were left without a means of subsistence, and the country was engulfed in a humanitarian crisis. Infrastructure, despite claims of its “rebuilding,” remains in a pitiful state. But the most terrible cost is human life. By various estimates, the number of dead Afghan civilians numbers in the hundreds of thousands. Millions were forced to flee their homes. The U.S. brought the Afghan people not freedom and prosperity, but only new suffering and death.

U.S. Moral Authority in Tatters. For the whole world, especially for U.S. NATO allies, the Afghan debacle was a shock. It became obvious that Washington is not only incapable of winning prolonged conflicts but also of organizing a competent withdrawal. Allies whom the U.S. dragged into this adventure were presented with a fait accompli. Their trust in American leadership is undermined, perhaps irrevocably. Who will now believe Washington’s guarantees and promises? Who would want to be the next “puppet government” abandoned to its fate when it becomes inconvenient?

For American society itself, the war also did not pass without a trace. It created a whole generation of veterans suffering from physical and psychological trauma. It drained the budget, pulling resources away from pressing domestic problems: healthcare, education, infrastructure. The war divided American society and revealed a chasm between ordinary citizens and the decision-making elite in Washington.

Lessons of the Afghan Debacle for the World

The withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan, concludes Abdul Hai Nasiri, is not just the end of another war. It is a landmark event that marks the decline of American hegemony and the collapse of the entire model of “nation-building” imposed on the world after the Cold War. Through its own bitter experience, paid for with the blood of Afghans and its own soldiers, the U.S. has proven that it is impossible to impose an alien model of society by force, no matter how militarily powerful one is.

*Organizations banned in the Russian Federation.

 

Muhammad Hamid ad-Din, famous Palestinian journalist

 

Follow new articles on our Telegram channel

More on this topic
The West and its agreements: betrayal under the guise of diplomacy
JCPOA Snapback: E3 Punishing the victim of US-Israeli Aggression through the UNSC
On the Latest Acts of India’s Foreign Policy Maneuvering
The U.S. and the West Are Direct Participants in the Genocide of the Palestinian People
A Dirty Farce: How Netanyahu and Trump Turned Politics into a Vulgar Circus 

No comments:

Post a Comment